For capital, sustainability is a financial variable at three load-bearing moments — diligence, hold, and exit.Underwrite it like the rest of the deal.
A target's sustainability profile materially affects underwritten value — supply-chain exposure, transition CAPEX, carbon-cost pass-through capacity, jurisdictional penalty risk. This is not a reputational variable. It is a financial one — and it shows up at three moments in the deal lifecycle.
Underwrite the regulatory exposure before you sign.
Close the gaps and keep the record current through the hold.
Hand the next buyer a defensible, exit-ready position.
Sustainability regulation lands unevenly across a portfolio company's products. Demand Map reads it line by line — which products meet regimes like EPR and CBAM where competitors don't, where regulation opens new revenue and where it strands it, and which lines to cut, hold, or invest behind. Foundation scores the entity. Demand Map scores the product portfolio. The first answers compliance; the second answers value creation.
Which lines clear EPR, CBAM and CSRD obligations — and where competitors fall short.
Where the regulation expands or erodes the addressable market, line by line.
Cut, hold, or invest behind each line — on a scored, cited record.
Sustainability requirements don't stop at the portfolio company — they cascade to its customers. As buyers come under CSRD, CBAM, and their own supplier mandates, procurement criteria change: demand expands for the products that help customers meet those obligations, and erodes for the ones that become a liability on the customer's books. Taza maps that cascade into TAM — line by line — so the deal team underwrites the revenue case, not just the compliance cost.
When a customer's mandate makes a product the compliant choice — lower-carbon inputs, traceable supply, reporting-ready materials — it shifts from optional to required. The addressable market grows as the regulation spreads across the customer base.
When a product adds compliance burden or embedded carbon cost to the customer's own books, buyers reformulate or design it out. The addressable market contracts ahead of the mandate, not after it.
CBAM levies, CSRD reporting infrastructure, EPR fees, supplier failures cascading into revenue interruption — balance-sheet items, not disclosures.
106K+ providers indexed against 728 business use cases and 12 ESG topics — the full curated field, including opportunities you haven't found. The record compounds through hold into exit.
A scored, cited read the deal team can defend — statements, obligations, and market perception in one decision-grade view, gap-inventoried, every claim sourced. Peer Map extends scope to a competitive set; Demand Map extends scope to the product portfolio.
Every gap becomes a scoped project, matched to named providers through a structured match. The IC gets a plan, not a list.
One command-center view across the portfolio. Each portco sees only itself; the sponsor sees everything — progress, gaps, live signal.
The engines re-run on cadence as regulation shifts. The next buyer underwrites against the same record — exit-ready, not assembled under pressure.
Public sources built in. Layer your proprietary scoring, internal benchmarks, or sector frameworks — all flowing through the same engines into one operational record.
Mandatory disclosure regimes mapped across every portco. The gap inventory is live, cited, and refreshed as regulation shifts.
Science-based targets, transition planning, producer responsibility — each framework mapped to a named provider who can close the gap.
A general model summarizes wherever you direct it — only as good as the questions you already know to ask. Taza runs a structured method over a proprietary record that compounds across every framework and engine that touches the deal. The exposure you weren't tracking. The gap behind the claim. The provider you'd never have found.
First reports in 5–7 days. Scored, cited, gap-inventoried. The entire deal team reads from the same record.