Taza — For corporate sustainability teams
LIVE CBAM · Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism CSRD · Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ISSB S1/S2 · International Sustainability Standards CA SB 253 · Climate Corporate Data Accountability CSDDD · Due Diligence Directive 40+ JURISDICTIONS · in active deployment LIVE CBAM · Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism CSRD · Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ISSB S1/S2 · International Sustainability Standards CA SB 253 · Climate Corporate Data Accountability CSDDD · Due Diligence Directive 40+ JURISDICTIONS · in active deployment
For corporate sustainability teams

Merit isn't the problem.
Evidence is.

Your proposals keep stalling. Not because they lack merit — because they arrive without the evidence a capital-allocation process needs.

Taza delivers the evidence the business case needs — scored, cited, project-level. You make the case.

Where the case actually passes

Your work gets funded in rooms you don't run.

Sustainability work rarely passes on a sustainability budget. It passes where the money already sits — and each of those rooms asks a different question. Walk in with the answer they review everything else against.

Diligence · deals & capital committees

"Does this hold up under review?"

A committee doesn't reject conviction — it rejects claims it can't trace. Every number in the room gets challenged; yours should survive it.

What you walk in with: a scored, cited read — every claim traceable to source.

Value creation · P&L owners

"Which line wins us revenue?"

P&L owners fund growth, not virtue. As your customers comply, demand moves — toward some of your product lines, away from others.

What you walk in with: a product-line read of where demand is moving, and the advantage your peers haven't found.

Compliance · legal, risk & audit

"What happens if we don't?"

Risk committees fund avoided loss. The reporting deadline isn't the risk — the gap behind it is, and it accrues whether or not the proposal passes.

What you walk in with: the company's own regulatory exposure, mapped entity by entity, regime by regime.

Meet it. Prove it. Get ahead of it.

The missing column in the memo

Every budget reads the same four columns.
Bring all four.

Proposals that pass speak the language capital allocation already uses. Not sustainability language — finance language: value created, risk avoided, four columns wide.

01

What it costs

Each gap arrives as a scoped project matched to providers who can deliver it — so the cost line comes from real scoping, not a defended guess.

02

What it avoids

Fines, penalties, and license-to-operate risk — your own exposure, mapped where your entities actually operate. The cost of inaction is a line item too.

03

What it protects

Brand value and reputational license — what the market already sees and says, read against the 76 Net Positive Attributes.

04

What it wins

Revenue generated and protected — which of your product lines win demand as your customers comply, and which lose it.

Most sustainability tools fill one column. The case needs all four — scored, cited, and current — or it waits another quarter.

The layer bands

Value creation. Risk avoidance.
Three layers of precision.

The two things every budget buys — and the two things sustainability teams struggle to say in finance language. Every read answers both: what does this create, what does this avoid — at the depth the room requires, on one cited spine.

01
Where the value sits

The four columns above — what it costs, what it avoids, what it protects, what it wins. The hallway answer: one sentence per column, each one true.

02
The moves that create it

Each gap becomes a scoped move. Meet the obligation — avoided fines and penalties. Prove the commitment — protected license, brand, and access to capital. Find the advantage — demand won and revenue protected.

03
The numbers your finance team can run

How much, over what timeframe: cited exposure figures, dated regulatory timelines, projects scoped and matched to providers who can deliver.Evidence finance can price. Taza never computes your cash flow — it hands finance inputs that survive review.

Priced on evidence

What can credibly become a cash-flow input

  • Claims scored consistently, cited to source — exposure, timelines, scoped costs.
  • Finance takes them into the model with the sources attached.
Called as judgment

What shouldn't be forced into a point estimate

  • Factors that move value or risk but don't price honestly — surfaced explicitly, not buried.
  • A human decides, with the evidence in front of them.

We don't dress judgment up as arithmetic.

Bands scale with your data — start on the public-data read, deepen it with your own, or run custom bands built to your criteria and your users.

The division of labor

Taza supplies the evidence.
You make the case.

The business case belongs to the person who knows the strategy — you, or the advisor working with you. What Taza does is make sure it never again arrives unsupported.

What Taza delivers

Evidence that survives the room

  • Scored — consistent across thousands of entities, against one recognized framework.
  • Cited — every claim traceable to source. Nothing arrives as a black box.
  • Project-level — gaps translated into scoped projects, matched to providers who can deliver.
  • Current — re-run on cadence, so the case is still true when it reaches the committee.
What Taza never does

Your judgment stays yours

  • Never writes the business case — the argument is yours; internal strategy lives with you.
  • Never computes your cash flow — finance models stay with finance.
  • Never makes the decision — a human decides, always. Taza accelerates that decision.
  • Never trains on your data — customer-proprietary data serves your engagement only.
The arc

A read becomes a plan.
The plan stays live as the world moves.

01 · Assess

Foundation

Where do we stand?

Obligations, public statements, and market perception composed into one decision-grade view. Scored, cited, gap-inventoried — the core of every Playbook.

02 · Translate + procure

Playbook

What do we do first, and what does it cost?

Every goal and gap becomes a scoped line-of-business project, matched to providers who can deliver — through a structured match. The deliverable, in a hosted portal.

03 · Collaborate

Brite

Who's in it with us?

Buyers and providers work the plan together on one network — command center, live feed, engagement tracking.

04 · Keep current

Pulse

Is it still true next quarter?

The engines re-run on cadence — and when a company-level event moves the picture. The Foundation you set compounds, it doesn't go stale.

Reporting tools look backward. Taza compounds intelligence.

The data behind the evidence

Built to be challenged.

A chatbot answers what you ask. Taza shows the gaps you didn't know to look for — scored, cited, first reports in 5–7 days. Built to stand up in a board review, an audit, or a customer's procurement diligence.

12ESG Topics · structured ontology
76Net Positive Attributes
728Use cases · capability-indexed
106K+Providers · indexed corpus
40+Jurisdictions · monitored
580+Members · from 30 Fortune 500

When procurement asks how the AI is governed: Earth51's SAFER, operationalized by Taza — Sustainability, Accountability, Fairness, Explainability, Resilience. The standing answer to responsible-AI diligence, built into how every read is produced.

Net positive isn't the pitch — it's the direction.
The value shows up when you move. Taza makes it visible when it does.

Walk in with the evidence.

The next committee meets either way. Book a 25-minute discovery call — bring the proposal that stalled.