Yours, one you hold, or a peer. Product by product: which policies apply, what they do to sales, and where money goes furthest. In 1 business day.
Compliance is where the map starts. Revenue is where it ends.
Everything the company and others have published that bears on sustainability, from every corner of the business.
Every source lands in the same structure, for every company, every time.
Too much information becomes one clear answer: where sales move, and what to do.
The same checks every time, so you can compare any company with the next.
What it has made public that bears on sustainability, from HR, IT, and operations as well as the sustainability team.
What external sources say about it: employees, industry, analysts, raters, investors, and NGOs.
What binds it, and when. Every obligation carries the date it was last checked.
How it compares with its peers on what it says, what others say, and what binds it.
Where demand goes as policy rolls out, product by product. Where it is strong, and where it misses.
The projects that close each gap, from 728 use cases, each mapped to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Who can deliver it comes with the Playbook.
Who can do the work? Browse experts and solutions yourself on Brite, by topic. The shortlist, matched on fit, comes with the Playbook.
One country acts in 2027, another in 2030.
See when it reaches your products, and your competitors’.
Same rule, three dates. You feel it in 2027. Your competitor, in 2028.
Use cases translate sustainability, technology, and science into the language of business. The 728 use cases are mapped to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and the 106,000+ solutions are mapped to the use cases. So one analysis shows what a project does to revenue and which goals it serves.
Shock, when it happens. A geopolitical event can reprice an input overnight, as the attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz did with energy in October 2026. When a shock is live, we show how it reaches each of the company’s products: which come under pressure, which are holding so far, and what nobody knows yet. Two companies in the same industry can come out of it very differently: one still depends on the input that just jumped, while the other switched a year ago.
Shock readings show direction, not figures. They are our analysts’ estimates, never a live feed.
Only what the change touches. Everything else stays as it was, with the date it was last checked.
Which products gain and which lose, whether the company’s published commitments still hold, and whether the projects that close the gap move up the list.
Where the record is still silent, you see the blank marked, not guessed.
A list of what a company does cannot show what it is missing. The gaps sit in the blanks: the rule nobody mapped, the commitment nobody reported against, the risk nobody measured.
Other tools leave the blanks out, so the
picture looks complete. You see every one, marked.
Every blank is also an invitation: share the data, and the estimate becomes a number.
Labelled, never estimated around.
A commitment made and never reported against is a finding, often a loud one.
Where numbers line up but nobody has shown the cause, you get the arithmetic, never the inference.
If a company blocks access, you still get the analysis of everything readable, with the block stated.
Add a private, invite-only Cube on Brite to share your Baseline with your team and work on it together. Every rule in it carries the date we last checked it.
Ranked by what they do to revenue, each with an owner and a date. Where the action is work to commission, you get a shortlist of partners who could do it, matched on fit, never on what anyone pays. Share it across your value chain: when we work with you directly, projects can be assigned to your suppliers and vendors too.
Ask about the PlaybookYou can check any finding: each one carries its source and retrieval date. Our AI is governed by SAFER, Earth51’s Responsible-AI framework, operationalized by Taza, with a human in the loop.
We hold our own AI to the standard we help you meet.
A person is in the loop by design.
Every company gets the same checks.
Every output traces back to its public source.
It re-runs as policy and peers change, with every date shown.